War of the Worlds

Discuss films.
User avatar
bannister
Posts: 1360
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 2:14 pm
Location: France
Contact:

War of the Worlds

Post by bannister » Fri Dec 10, 2004 2:46 am

First teaser HERE.

Fisrt part is boring but the "hill" part is awesome. It's gonna be a good good good Spielberg ! (I hope).

User avatar
Kazu
Site Admin
Posts: 9337
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 8:59 pm
Location: Seattle, WA
Contact:

Post by Kazu » Fri Dec 10, 2004 3:03 am

I'm really, really looking forward to this. Man, I can't believe they're just shooting it now with the release set for Summer 2005. Spielberg works at the speed of light...
Image
Image

User avatar
bannister
Posts: 1360
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 2:14 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by bannister » Fri Dec 10, 2004 3:05 am

I heard the CGI artists are on the nerves because they're out of schedule and they can't be late for the release.

Reagan
Posts: 660
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 5:01 pm
Contact:

Post by Reagan » Fri Dec 10, 2004 3:38 am

Spielberg is one of my all time heros. I can't think of a single movie of his that I've seen and didn't like (including AI). This WILL be awesome.

User avatar
Joe Shig
Posts: 808
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 6:18 am
Location: Melbourne.

Post by Joe Shig » Fri Dec 10, 2004 7:33 am

Consider me officially teased.
--Joe.

User avatar
househatke
Posts: 1213
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2004 10:37 pm
Location: VA
Contact:

Post by househatke » Fri Dec 10, 2004 11:43 am

Yuck. Yuck yuck yuck.

Setting this in modern day is a positively wretched idea. Part of the wonder and charm of the book is that it is set at the turn of the last century. It's a victorian story. I don't see why Spielberg cant play the movie straight.

Anna pointed out, and I think she's right, that part of the thrill of War of the Worlds is the lack of instant communication. In this version ol' Tom Cruise can see what's around him and instead of getting the account of desolation in the city from passers by he can just call it up on his cell phone or check his e-mail or whatever.

I just can't see this working and still retaining the flavor of the book.

If we want a War of the Worlds set in modern times, let's just rent Independance Day.

User avatar
bannister
Posts: 1360
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 2:14 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by bannister » Fri Dec 10, 2004 12:10 pm

I totally agree with you Ben, and Anna too.

User avatar
Hupselipup
Posts: 448
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 2:07 pm
Contact:

Post by Hupselipup » Fri Dec 10, 2004 12:43 pm

Ah yes, I agree too, but what if the aliens whipe out most forms of communication first? That would make it even worse for all those modern humans who are used to their cell phones and internet connections.

User avatar
bannister
Posts: 1360
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 2:14 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by bannister » Fri Dec 10, 2004 1:02 pm

mmmhh... You're a clever guy Hups. :wink:

User avatar
neil
Posts: 2604
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 3:21 pm
Location: SF bay area, CA
Contact:

Post by neil » Fri Dec 10, 2004 1:28 pm

That's a great insight, Mr. & Mrs. Hatke. Even Orson Welles' radio play thrilled and horrified people by making clever use of the barriers of communication. Like Hupselipup, I hope they find a way to retain that aspect of it.

I'll have to check out the trailer later unfortunately...

User avatar
Joel
Posts: 594
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Orlando, Fl.
Contact:

Post by Joel » Fri Dec 10, 2004 2:38 pm

Still wish it was set a hundred years ago, and not really digging that Cruise is in it, but I'm a huge fans of Tripods of any sort.
It should be fun!

In other, possible tie-in news, Mr. Seigneret and I might be working on something in the martian vein next year.....

User avatar
Nick
Posts: 1043
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 10:24 am
Location: UK - Warwickshire

Post by Nick » Fri Dec 10, 2004 2:48 pm

IF IT AIN'T BROKE, DON'T FIX IT!

Jeez, they couldn't even stick to the narrative. Well hopefully it'll be decent, but it won't be War of The Worlds. I'm absolutely gagging to see a version of this film that's true to the book, looks like I'll have to wait a while longer.

Thanks for pointing it out though Bannister, I'd heard mutterings of a War of The Worlds film, but hadn't seen anything until now. I didn't see it in the trailer, but they will be using tripods won't they? WON'T THEY?! I wonder if the film will end in the same way as the book...I can't imagine that would be sufficiently exciting enough for the execs. Hehe, oh well. :)
Image

User avatar
deantrippe
Posts: 838
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 2:34 pm
Location: Orange County, CA
Contact:

Post by deantrippe » Fri Dec 10, 2004 2:52 pm

Joel wrote:Still wish it was set a hundred years ago, and not really digging that Cruise is in it, but I'm a huge fans of Tripods of any sort.
Ditto.
Joel wrote:In other, possible tie-in news, Mr. Seigneret and I might be working on something in the martian vein next year.....
Whoa! Way more exciting.

User avatar
Coheteboy
Posts: 749
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 3:06 am
Location: Orange County, CA
Contact:

Post by Coheteboy » Sat Dec 11, 2004 3:23 pm

Wow, I thought this trailer was pretty haunting! I can't wait to see what spielberg delivers to us next year!
My name is Dave.

User avatar
Siftland
Posts: 85
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 9:20 pm
Contact:

Post by Siftland » Sat Dec 11, 2004 3:55 pm

Reagan wrote:Spielberg is one of my all time heros. I can't think of a single movie of his that I've seen and didn't like.
That's funny. I can't think of a single movie of his I like.




Victorian vs. aliens would have been a good start though.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests